The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro sits at the top of Xiaomi’s mid-range Redmi lineup, and it packs quite a punch for a phone with a modest price tag. Show It’s powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 732G chipset and features a 6.67-inch AMOLED FHD+ display with a 120 Hz refresh rate. There are three memory/storage configurations: 6 GB / 64 GB, 6 GB / 128 GB, and 8 GB / 128 GB. The rear camera hump houses a 108 MP main camera (binning down to 12 MP output), an 8 MP ultra-wide, and a 5 MP macro module. There’s also a 2 MP depth-sensing camera for bokeh simulation. Read on to find out how they perform in our DXOMARK Camera tests. Key camera specifications:
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 106 camera 80 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (111) 85 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (107) 93 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109) 85 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best: Xiaomi Mi 11 (111) 67 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (102) 69 Best: Google Pixel 6 (77) 34 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best: Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ (82) 65 Huawei P50 Pro Best: Huawei P50 Pro (80) 43 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (80) 62 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (140) 36 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (58) 76 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (118) 79 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (107) 82 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (109) 64 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) Best: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) (99) 90 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (105) 70 Xiaomi 12S Ultra Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (85) 94 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best: Vivo X70 Pro+ (103) Pros
Cons
With an overall score of 106, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro does not land near the top of the DXOMARK Camera overall ranking, but is a respectable number three in the Advanced ($200-399) price segment, comparing favorably to slightly more expensive options like the Apple iPhone SE (103) and the Oppo Find X2 Neo (105). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro captures pleasing images under ideal conditions, but performance is less impressive under challenging lighting. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s main camera can capture pleasing images as long as the lighting isn’t too challenging (that is, not too dark, not too much dynamic range); and while its Photo score of 111 lags behind most higher-end offerings, it is excellent for the Advanced category. The Zoom composite score of 52 is not particularly impressive, held back mainly by limited tele performance, but we’ve seen worse. The video score of 95 is respectable at this price point, and even edges past the far more expensive Exynos versions of Samsung’s Galaxy S21 and S21+ models (93). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro can’t compete with most flagship phones in terms of imaging quality, but it’s still a high-value proposition for mobile photographers on a budget. Below you can find a detailed analysis and image samples for all Photo, Zoom, and Video sub-attributes, as well as comparisons with two of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s competitors, the Nokia 8.3 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. PhotoThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro achieves a Photo score of 111. In this section, we take a closer look at each sub-attribute and compare image quality against competitors. Exposure and ContrastXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 80 111 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (111) In these tests we analyze target exposure, contrast, and dynamic range, including repeatability across a series of images. Tests are undertaken in a wide range of light conditions, including backlit scenes and low light down to 1 lux. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s exposure performance in backlit conditions compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, highlight clipping Nokia 8.3 5G, highlight and shadow clipping Samsung A51 5G, highlight clipping ColorXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 85 107 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (107) In these tests we analyze color rendering, skin tones, white balance, and color shading, including repeatability across a series of images. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s color performance in outdoor light compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, green cast Nokia 8.3 5G, more neutral color Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, pink cast AutofocusXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 93 109 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best: Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders (109) In these tests we analyze autofocus accuracy and shooting time, including repeatability, in the lab. We test focus failures, depth of field, and tracking of moving subjects using perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s autofocus performance outdoors with two subjects at different distances.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, autofocus Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: focus not on nearest subject
Nokia 8.3 5G, crop: focus on first subject
Samsung A51 5G, autofocus Samsung A51 5G, crop: focus on first subject TextureXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 85 111 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best: Xiaomi Mi 11 (111) In these tests we analyze texture on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s texture performance in outdoor light compared to the competition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, texture Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: good detail
Nokia 8.3 5G, crop: acceptable detail
Samsung A51 5G, crop: acceptable detail This graph shows the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s texture measurements in the lab. Texture comparison: texture drops off in low light. NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 64 102 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (102) In these tests we analyze noise on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s noise performance in low light compared to the competition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, noise Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: good detail
Nokia 8.3 5G, crop: acceptable detail
Samsung A51 5G, crop: acceptable detail BokehXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 65 80 Huawei P50 Pro Best: Huawei P50 Pro (80) For these tests we switch to the camera’s bokeh or portrait mode and analyze depth estimation, bokeh shape, blur gradient, and repeatability, as well as all other general image quality attributes mentioned above. The score is derived from perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s bokeh simulation in daylight compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, good subject separation, natural blur Nokia 8.3 5G, obvious depth-sensing errors, natural blur Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, depth-sensing artifacts, low overall detail NightXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 34 82 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best: Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ (82) In these tests we shoot a selection of images in pitch-black darkness as well as with city lights in the background providing some illumination. We shoot sample images with the camera at default settings in both flash-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all image quality attributes but we pay particular attention to exposure, autofocus, and color. We do not test night modes that have to be activated manually. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s night performance in flash-auto mode compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, flash-auto: good exposure, noise fairly well controlled Nokia 8.3 5G, flash-auto: good exposure, more noise Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, flash-auto: good target exposure, dark background (flash fired) ArtifactsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 62 77 Google Pixel 6 Best: Google Pixel 6 (77) In these tests we check images for optical artifacts such as vignetting, flare, lens softness in the corner, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, as well as for processing artifacts such as ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing. This sample shows ghosting artifacts.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, artifacts
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: ghosting artifacts PreviewXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 43 80 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (80) In these tests we analyze the image quality of the preview image and the differences between preview images and captured images, particularly in terms of exposure, dynamic range, and bokeh effect. We also check the smoothness of the field-of-view changes on the preview image when zooming with both buttons or when using the pinch-zoom gesture. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s preview performance in portrait mode.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, preview in Portrait mode: no blur shown Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, final image: portrait blur applied ZoomThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro achieves a Zoom score of 45. The Zoom score includes the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against competitors. WideXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 36 58 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (58) In these tests we analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 to 20 mm. We look at all image quality attributes, but we pay particular attention to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. These samples show the performance of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s ultra-wide camera in indoor conditions compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, ultra-wide: slight lack of contrast and desaturated colors Nokia 8.3 5G, ultra-wide: better color Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, ultra-wide: widest coverage TeleXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 62 140 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (140) In these tests we analyze all image quality attributes at focal lengths from approximately 40 to 300 mm, paying particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s and its competitors’ tele performance outdoors at a 110 mm equivalent zoom setting.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, 110 mm zoom Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: lack of detail
Nokia 8.3 5G, 110 mm zoom
Nokia 8.3 5G, crop: low detail
Samsung A51 5G, 110 mm zoom Samsung A51 5G, crop: low (though slightly better) detail VideoThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro achieves a Video score of 95. A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. In this section, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare video quality against competitors. In our Video tests we analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as white balance and color rendering, but we also include such temporal aspects as speed, and smoothness and stability of exposure, and autofocus. NOTE: The sample video clips in this section are best viewed at 4K resolution. Exposure and ContrastXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 76 118 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (118) These video stills show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s tendency to make sudden changes in video exposure. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, video still Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, video still, 8 frames later: brighter exposure and more highlight clipping ColorXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 79 107 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best: Honor Magic4 Ultimate (107) These video stills show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s video color in indoor light compared to the competition. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, video still, pleasant skin tones Nokia 8.3 5G, video still, pleasant skin tones Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, video still, reddish cast AutofocusXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 82 109 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (109) These sample clips show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s video autofocus performance in low light. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, focus steps visible, but focus is accurate Nokia 8.3 5G, fast, accurate focus
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, refocusing and errors TextureXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 64 99 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) Best: Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) (99) This graph shows the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s video texture measurements in the lab. Video texture comparison: lower detail than reference devices, dropping in falling light NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 90 105 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best: Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (105) These sample clips show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s video noise performance in low light. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, noise well controlled indoors Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, high noise ArtifactsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 70 85 Xiaomi 12S Ultra Best: Xiaomi 12S Ultra (85) For video artifacts, we check for the same kinds of artifacts mentioned in the Photo section, along with such video-specific artifacts as frame rate variation in different light conditions, judder effect, and moving artifacts (artifacts such as aliasing, color quantization, and flare can often be more intrusive when moving than in a still image). This video still shows moiré on the thin slats of the balcony railing.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, video still Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, crop: moiré artifact StabilizationXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 94 103 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best: Vivo X70 Pro+ (103) In these tests we analyze residual motion when handholding the camera during recording, as well as when walking and running with the camera. We also look for stabilization artifacts such as jello effect, sharpness differences between frames, and frame shift (abrupt changes of framing). These sample clips show the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s video stabilization in outdoor conditions. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, some residual motion
Nokia 8.3 5G, less effective stabilization Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, less effective stabilization In the PressRedmi Note 10 Pro kac zoom?Mi Note 10 Pro arka kısımda 108 MP'lik 5 kameraya sahip. 2x ve 5x zoom özellikleri ile ön plana çıkıyor.
Redmi Note 10 Pro kamera kaç x?Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 128 GB 8 GB RAM (Xiaomi Türkiye Garantili) Özellikleri. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 kaç x zoom?Bu fotoğraflarda modelin 2x optik, 5x optik ve 10x hibrit zoom gücü gözler önüne seriyor. Optik zoom altyapısında bildiğiniz üzere kalite kaybı bulunmuyor. Hibrit sistemlerde ise kalite kaybı olabilecek en minimum düzeyde tutuluyor. 50x dijital zoom kalite kaybı yaşatarak görev yapıyor.
Note 10 Pro kamerası iyi mi?Redmi Note 10 Pro kamerası ile göz dolduruyor
Puanlama açısından ise cihaz; klasik fotoğrafçılıkta 111 puan alırken, Zoom kategorisinde de 52 puan aldı. iPhone SE ise aynı kategorilerde sırasıyla 108 ve 23 puan elde etti. Redmi Note 10 Pro, kamerasıyla iyi işler çıkarıyor.
|
Redmi note 10 pro kaç x zoom
İlgili Mesajlar
Telif hakkı © 2024 mesadeestudo Inc.
